The NFL’s annual coaching carousel doesn’t just reshuffle sidelines — it quietly reshapes betting markets, locker room identities, and in many cases the trajectory of entire franchises. Entering the 2026 season, ten teams will begin the year with new head coaches. Oddsmakers have already drawn a sharp line between expected risers and potential fallers in the win column. Which teams with new coaches will see an uptick in wins in 2026?

Here’s the fascinating part: only three of those teams are projected to regress in total wins, while seven are expected to improve. That split says less about coaching résumés and more about roster timelines, quarterback stability, and how quickly new systems can take hold.

Below is a deeper, non-generic look at what those win totals really signal. But first, here’s a recap of the NFL’s new coaches for 2026.

Arizona Cardinals: Mike LaFleur

Atlanta Falcons: Kevin Stefanski

Baltimore Ravens: Jesse Minter

Buffalo Bills: Joe Brady

Cleveland Browns: Todd Monken

Las Vegas Raiders: Klint Kubiak

Miami Dolphins: Jeff Hafley

New York Giants: John Harbaugh

Pittsburgh Steelers: Mike McCarthy

Tennessee Titans: Robert Saleh

The Rebuild Tier

Cardinals (5.5), Browns (5.5), Titans (5.5), Raiders (6.5), Dolphins (5.5)

These teams share one defining trait: structural transition. New coaches here aren’t simply tweaking schemes — they’re installing culture, redefining quarterback plans, and often resetting expectations.

Arizona & Tennessee: Patience Over Immediate Payoff

Win totals in the mid-five range usually mean sportsbooks expect competitive losses rather than outright collapse. For both franchises, the real 2026 victory would be:

• Offensive systems that finally fit their quarterbacks

• Young defensive cores showing week-to-week growth

• Fewer late-game breakdowns that inflate loss totals

Historically, first-year coaches in true rebuilds often beat perception in Year 2, not Year 1. So the betting intrigue isn’t just the over/under — it’s whether these teams show enough cohesion to become 2027 sleeper candidates.

Cleveland & Las Vegas: Volatility Is the Story

Both rosters carry high-variance talent. That makes coaching impact more dramatic:

• If locker-room buy-in hits early, overs become live quickly.

• If quarterback inconsistency lingers, under tickets cash by December.

These are classic “swing outcome” teams where coaching psychology matters as much as play-calling.

Miami: The Only Low Total With Expectations

A 5.5 number here feels different. Unlike pure rebuilds, Miami’s roster suggests underachievement correction rather than teardown.

That makes the new coach’s job uniquely pressure-packed: win quickly or risk the label of wasted talent.

The Middle-Class Movers: Where Coaching Matters Most

Falcons (8.5), Giants (8.5), Steelers (8.5)

Eight-and-a-half is the NFL’s most revealing number. It implies:

• Competitive roster

• Playoff fringe potential

• Coaching as the swing factor

Atlanta & New York: Scheme Meets Quarterback Reality

Both teams sit in the league’s most delicate balance — good enough to contend, flawed enough to miss.

For new coaches, success hinges on:

• Maximizing quarterback efficiency rather than chasing splash plays

• Turning close losses into one-score wins

• Establishing defensive consistency week to week

Historically, this tier produces the largest Year-1 coaching jumps, because talent is already playoff-adjacent.

Pittsburgh: Stability Replaced by Uncertainty

The Steelers rarely live in transition. That alone makes this situation compelling.

An 8.5 projection signals sportsbooks expect:

• Cultural continuity to soften the coaching change

• Defense to remain competitive

• Offense to determine ceiling

If the offense modernizes quickly, this number could look one of the softest overs on the board.
If not, regression becomes real for the first time in years.

The Contender Question Marks

Ravens (10.5), Bills (10.5)

New coaches almost never inherit double-digit win expectations. That’s what makes these two cases fascinating.

Baltimore: System Tweaks, Not Culture Change

A 10.5 line suggests:

• Championship-caliber roster

• Minimal tolerance for adjustment period

• Coaching judged purely by January success, not September learning

The key question isn’t can they win?
It’s can they win differently when postseason defenses force adaptation.

Buffalo: Regression Signals Pressure

Unlike Baltimore, Buffalo’s total reflects skepticism.

Oddsmakers projecting fewer wins typically point to:

• Roster turnover at key depth spots

• Coaching transition affecting late-game execution

• Thin margin between 12 wins and 9 in a competitive conference

This is the rare contender where Year-1 coaching impact could swing playoff seeding dramatically.

What History Says About First-Year Coaches

Across the past two decades:

• First-year coaches average roughly half a win of improvement overall.

• Rebuild teams rarely jump immediately.

• Fringe playoff teams see the biggest Year-1 spikes.

• Contenders usually hold steady or dip slightly before rebounding.

That historical lens aligns almost perfectly with the 2026 totals.

The Real Betting Insight for 2026

The most important takeaway isn’t which teams go over or under.

It’s this: Coaching impact shows up fastest where talent already exists.

That points squarely at:

• Falcons

• Giants

• Steelers

Meanwhile, the long-term value may live with:

• Cardinals

• Titans

• Browns

And the highest-pressure microscope sits on:

• Bills

• Ravens

Final Thought

Every offseason promises transformation. But in 2026, the league’s coaching reset isn’t evenly distributed — it’s surgically concentrated at the NFL’s most fragile competitive tiers.

That’s what makes this season intriguing for fans and bettors alike:

Not just who improves,
but how quickly coaching proves it matters.

Responsible Gaming

For help and resources, visit our Responsible Gaming page or the National Council on Problem Gambling.

Affiliate Disclosure

We may receive affiliate commissions if you sign up through links on our site. Read our full Affiliate Disclosure.