NEW YORK (AP) -Hearst Corp. wants the federal government to explain why it unsealed a sworn statement containing names of players implicated by former Mets clubhouse attendant Kirk Radomski after telling a court the information had to remain secret.
In a four-page brief filed Friday with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Hearst said the government ``may have been violating the very same sealing order it was defending'' when it gave former Senate majority leader George Mitchell permission to publish the names of players accused of using performance-enhancing drugs by Radomski. Hearst contends they were the same names contained in the affidavit of IRS Special Agent Jeff Novitzky.
When Novitzky's December 2005 affidavit was initially made public in April, names of the players he implicated were blacked out. Hearst, on behalf of the San Francisco Chronicle and Albany Times Union, went to court in June asking that the complete affidavit be made public.
The U.S. attorney's office in San Francisco and the Major League Baseball Players Association opposed the request, and in September U.S. District Judge Thomas C. Platt in Central Islip ruled there was no public right to the names. Hearst then appealed.
On Dec. 20, seven days after Mitchell's report on drug use in baseball was released, a federal court in New York unsealed the affidavit at the request of the government. The same day, a federal court in Phoenix unsealed another Novitzky affidavit involving pitcher Jason Grimsley, and the U.S. attorney asked the circuit court to dismiss Hearst's appeal, saying the case was moot.
Although the government told the district court in its unsealing motion that Radomski's ``cooperation is now substantially complete,'' Hearst said the government earlier told the district court the statement should be kept secret because it needed cooperation of those named in the affidavit.
Hearst and the MLBPA also are upset they never had the chance to respond to the motion to unseal the affidavit.
``This represents yet another instance of the government playing fast and loose with the courts and the rights of others,'' Hearst said.
The affidavit contained the names of several players not named in the Mitchell Report, including Sid Fernandez and Pete Rose Jr. The players' association said those players' ``privacy interests have therefor been seriously invaded without notice or hearing'' and that the government made an ``end run'' by asking Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle to unseal the statement rather than Platt.
Hearst wants the case sent back to district court for the government to explain why it didn't give notice of its motion to unseal and ``to account for the disparity between its representations to the court.'' The union asked that the case be sent to district court for additional proceedings that court considers ``appropriate.''
``The public's right of access cannot coexist with government efforts to limit or control disclosure of judicial records through means of selective disclosure, much less where premised on representations that cannot be squared with the facts,'' Hearst said.
Calls to the U.S. attorney's office and a lawyer for the MLBPA were not immediately returned.

Recent MLB Discussions

MLB Trends Thursday, May 26 on Thu, May 2016 by Blade
MLB Trends Wednesday, May 25 on Wed, May 2016 by Blade
May Pitchers Report on Wed, May 2016 by Blade

Top MLB Public Bets

MLB Top Stories

Thumbnail Marlins vs. Rays Prediction Are the Marlins a good bet to cash today for bettors when they take on the Rays in Tampa at 1:10PM ET?
Thumbnail Can Reds contain rolling Dodgers tonight? Everybody’s picking on the last-place Reds at the moment. Why not add the Dodgers’ Scott Kazmir to the group?
Thumbnail A's vs. Mariners Prediction Will tonight's AL West matchup between the A's and Mariners be a high-scoring affair at 10:10PM ET?
Thumbnail Diamondbacks vs. Pirates Total Pick Will the Pittsburgh Pirates continue to pile up the runs against the Arizona Diamondbacks when they meet tonight at 7PM...
Thumbnail Blue Jays vs. Yankees Prediction The Yankees are red-hot but can the Blue Jays end the Bombers' six-game winning streak tonight at 7:05PM ET?
More inMLB Articles  

MLB Team Pages