WASHINGTON (AP) -The Washington Redskins have won the latest round in a 16-year court battle against a group of American Indians, prevailing on a technicality that again skirts the issue of whether the team's nickname is racially offensive.
In a ruling dated June 25 and first circulated Thursday, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ruled that the youngest of the seven Native American plaintiffs waited too long after turning 18 to file the lawsuit that attempts to revoke the Redskins trademarks.
The lead plaintiff, Suzan Shown Harjo, said Friday the group will appeal.
``She ruled as we anticipated she would: for the loophole that would allow everyone to avoid the merits of the case,'' said Harjo, president of the Washington-based Morning Star Institute that advances Native American causes.
Harjo and her fellow plaintiffs have been working since 1992 to have the Redskins trademarks declared invalid. They initially won - the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office panel canceled the trademarks in 1999 - but Kollar-Kotelly overturned the ruling in 2003 in part because the suit was filed decades after the first Redskins trademark was issued in 1967.
The U.S. Court of Appeals then sent the case back to Kollar-Kotelly, noting that the youngest of the plaintiffs was only 1 year old in 1967 and therefore could not have taken legal action at the time.
But Kollar-Kotelly's new ruling rejects that possible argument. She wrote that the youngest plaintiff turned 18 in 1984 and therefore ``waited almost eight years'' after coming of age to join the lawsuit.
The judge did not address whether the Redskins name is offensive or racist. She wrote that her decision was not based on the larger issue of ``the appropriateness of Native American imagery for team names.''
The Redskins declined to comment, referring calls to attorney Bob Raskopf, who has been representing the team and the NFL in the case. Raskopf did not immediately return a call seeking comment.
The case now heads back to the U.S. Court of Appeals. Should it agree that Harjo's group was too old to sue, she has a backup plan: A group of six American Indians ranging in age from 18 to 24 filed essentially the same lawsuit two years ago. That suit is on hold until Harjo's case is resolved.
Harjo therefore anticipates that one day, a court will have to decide once and for all whether the Redskins name is offensive.
``It's so ironic that they would like to get rid of this though the loophole of passage of time, when we're in our 16th year of litigation,'' Harjo said. ``Unbelievable. If this (lawsuit) were a child, we would be preparing the child to go to college.''

Recent NFL Discussions

CFL Betting News and Notes Week 6 on Thu, Jul 2017 by Blade
College Football Conference Previews on Wed, Jul 2017 by Blade
Improve your NFL betting skills on Tue, Jul 2017 by JJordan90
CFL Betting News and Notes Week 5 on Mon, Jul 2017 by Blade
Pac-12 Schedule Breakdown on Sun, Jul 2017 by Blade

Top NFL Public Bets

NFL Top Stories

Thumbnail Falcons' 2017 Win Total Prediction Will the Falcons have a Super Bowl hangover or are they a good bet to go over their season win total over/under?
Thumbnail Patriots' 2017 Over/Under Prediction Could the Patriots actually go 16-0 in the regular season? Here's our prediction for New England's 2017 win total.
Thumbnail Rams 2017 Win Total Prediction Armed with a new coaching staff, how many wins with the L.A. Rams finish with in 2017?
Thumbnail Don't Pass on these NFL Betting Picks It may be of small comfort that that the regular season is still one and a half months away from starting, but compared to the long wait we’ve had since the...
Thumbnail Betting Against Terrible NFL Teams When you have a great handle on just how an NFL franchise is going to perform heading into a brand new season, well, clearly, that’s a good thing that will allow...

NFL Team Pages