TORONTO (AP) -The head of the NHL Players’ Association believes it is time to consider a rule mandating helmet use during fights and to examine the role of one-dimensional enforcers in the game.
While a “clear majority” of players want fighting to remain a part of hockey, Paul Kelly feels his constituency is open to restrictions on the process.
“A couple that we’ve talked about that ought to be looked at anyway is, do you consider a rule whereby players need to keep a helmet on during the course of a fight, and perhaps require officials to step in if a helmet comes off during a fight,” Kelly said Wednesday before the Conn Smythe Celebrities Dinner and Auction.
“If it’s true that when guys get hurled to the ice or tripped to the ice and bang their skull on the ice is where the real danger comes from, then maybe we can protect against that. It’s certainly something worth looking at,” the union chief added.
d “staged fights” between two players with skill sets limited to throwing punches may no longer have a place in the game. The potential damage that strong men who stand well over 6 feet on skates and weigh more than 250 pounds can inflict might now make such bouts too dangerous.
“If it’s a staged fight between two superheavyweights that perhaps arranged it a day before the game, I’m not so sure those are the fights that we need to continue to have in the sport,” Kelly said. “And if they’re the most dangerous fights, we ought to take a good, hard look at those.
“I’m not advocating elimination of their jobs, I’m talking about the question of safety. If those guys can hold a roster spot and skate on a fourth line and play and engage in fights which arise from the emotion of the game, great. But if they’re only there for one purpose, then I think that’s at least one issue our competition committee will take a hard look at.”
Kelly’s comments came less than two weeks after NHL commissioner Gary Bettman said fighting’s “rules of engagement” will be examined during a general managers meeting in March.
The fighting debate has been growing since March 2007 when league disciplinarian Colin Campbell suggested it was time to ask whether fisticuffs belonged in hockey.
s taken from the ice on a stretcher after he was knocked out in a fight. The incidents have since become more worrisome.
The issue became magnified last month after Ontario senior men’s league player Don Sanderson fell into a coma after striking his head on the ice during a fight and then died. A few weeks later, Garrett Klotz suffered a seizure and was taken from the ice on a stretcher after a fight in an American Hockey League game.
The Ontario Hockey League has since instituted rules to ensure players keep their helmets on during fights. The AHL said it would follow the NHL’s lead.
Kelly insisted that the issue needs a thorough examination by the NHL’s competition committee, and that fighting should not be eliminated in a knee-jerk reaction.
“We shouldn’t allow one tragic event to dictate wholesale rule changes in our sport,” he said.
Instead, Kelly argued that fights arising “out of the spontaneity of the game, the adrenaline of the game, the emotion and the need to protect a teammate or yourself from an unclean hit,” were a natural part of hockey and were a required element of the sport.
He went on to say that Wayne Gretzky would have played “several hundred” fewer games in his career if he didn’t have Dave Semenko and Marty McSorley as teammates.
gone after him, and when you have guys in there to protect the star players, the skill players, the people fans pay good money to go watch, it deters that type of conduct, it protects those star players,” Kelly said. “It actually, in many respects, reduced the amount of violence in our sport.
“Fighting isn’t just there for some gratuitous reason. It’s there because there’s a need to self police, there’s a need to protect those kinds of players in our sport. And I think that if you get rid of fighting, you’re going to have some consequences that are very unfortunate.”
Add A Comment