Appeal expected in ex-Bengals cheerleader lawsuit Print
Written by Admin   
Friday, 12 July 2013 04:29
 COVINGTON, Ky. (AP) - A gossip website operator who lost a defamation lawsuit brought by a former Cincinnati Bengals cheerleader plans to appeal, and some First Amendment lawyers warn the verdict could adversely affect other websites.
A federal court jury in Covington, Ky., awarded Sarah Jones $338,000 in damages Thursday, finding that posts about Jones on the Scottsdale, Ariz.-based website in 2009 were substantially false.
The jury also found website operator Nik Richie acted with malice or reckless disregard in posting the submissions he said were anonymous.
One post alleged Jones had sex with every Bengals player, and the other said she probably had two sexually transmitted diseases. Jones said the posts were false and caused her severe mental anguish.
Richie denied any malice and said he wasn't required to fact-check anonymous submissions before posting them.
The posts were unrelated to Jones' 2012 guilty plea to charges she had sex with an underage former student. Jones avoided jail time, but was forbidden from teaching again. She and the now 18-year-old former student have said they plan to marry.
Cincinnati attorney Jack Greiner, who specializes in media and free speech issues, said the lawsuit verdict could have a chilling effect on other website operators.
``I think it could put some limits on the ability of a website operator to feel free to post comments that might be offensive or controversial or even just critical,'' Greiner said. ``People might err on the side of caution and not take a risk, even if comments are acceptable.''
Richie's attorney, David Gingras, also believes holding Richie responsible for posts created by a third party will have a negative effect on free speech for other people and websites.
Gingras previously asked U.S. District Judge William Bertelsman to dismiss the lawsuit, saying Richie's website and others around the country are protected under the Communications Decency Act. Part of that law was intended to provide immunity to website operators from liability for content that comes from third parties.
The judge ruled that law did not shield from liability.
``There's no question that his ruling is wrong,'' said Gingras, who has won similar lawsuits on the same issue.
But Jones' attorney, Eric Deters, said Richie has acknowledged screening submissions, deciding which comments are posted and adding his own comments. That makes the different from other websites like Facebook where people post their own comments.
``Judge Bertelsman got it right,'' Deters said, adding he is confident of winning any appeal.
He hopes the verdict will ``reduce the number of defamation comments made on these types of websites.''
But Nate Cardozo, of the Electronic Frontier Foundation that focuses on civil liberties and privacy issues in the digital age, told The Associated Press ``the judge got it dead wrong.''
Jones could sue for false statements but ``she can only sue the person who made the statements,'' said Cardozo, a staff attorney with the nonprofit foundation.
A message left for the judge was not immediately returned.
Jones, 28, said Thursday that she was grateful to the jury for hearing the evidence and basing its decision on that evidence.
A January trial of the lawsuit produced a hung jury. Jurors in the retrial deliberated over two days.

NFL Team Pages

Recent NFL Discussions

Top NFL Public Bets

#1 471 Miami Dolphins 86%
#2 468 New York Jets 82%
#3 478 Arizona Cardinals 79%
#4 469 Indianapolis Colts 78%
#5 491 Minnesota Vikings 77%
#6 482 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 75%
#7 483 Cincinnati Bengals 75%
#8 463 Green Bay Packers 75%
#9 475 Seattle Seahawks 72%
#10 487 New York Giants 69%
View All: NFL |  NBA |  NCAAF |  NCAAB |  MLB |  NHL

NFL Futures

View All

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Contact Us | Advertising | 888-99-SPREAD

THIS IS NOT A GAMBLING SITE – If you think you have a gambling problem click here.

Disclaimer: This site is for informational and entertainment purposes only. Individual users are responsible for the laws regarding accessing gambling information from their jurisdictions. Many countries around the world prohibit gambling, please check the laws in your location. Any use of this information that may violate any federal, state, local or international law is strictly prohibited.

Copyright: The information contained on website is protected by international copyright and may not be reproduced, or redistributed in any way without expressed written consent.

About: is the largest sports betting news site in the United States. We provide point spread news, odds, statistics and information to over 199 countries around the world each year. Our coverage includes all North American College and Professional Sports as well as entertainment, political and proposition wagering news.