PHILADELPHIA (AP) - A federal court hearing Tuesday in Philadelphia could determine whether the NFL faces years of litigation over concussion-related brain injuries.
Thousands of former players have accused league officials of concealing what they knew about the risk of playing after a concussion. The lawsuits allege the league glorified violence as the game became a $9 billion-a-year industry.
Some former players suffer from dementia, depression and other brain diseases, and a few have committed suicide. Others are seeking medical monitoring.
The NFL denies any fraud or negligence, and insists that player safety has always been a priority. The league believes the complaints should go to arbitration under terms of the players' collective bargaining agreement.
U.S. District Judge Anita Brody will hear arguments from Supreme Court litigators Paul Clement for the NFL and David Frederick for the players. Brody's ruling is not expected for several months, and is likely to be appealed by the losing side.
It could be years before the cases are resolved, but some observers believe they could cost the league billions of dollars if the players are successful. Their lawyers hope to use the discovery process to access NFL files, including those on the league's much-criticized Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Committee, which was formed in the 1990s and headed by a rheumatologist, not a neurologist.
Some believe the cases could rival class-action lawsuits against Big Tobacco in terms of the discovery process, although the tobacco litigation involved far more people. About one-third of the league's 12,000 former players have filed suit.
They include two-time Super Bowl quarterback Jim McMahon, who is suffering from early-stage dementia and has said if he had to do it over again, he would play baseball.
Other plaintiffs include the family of Pro Bowler Junior Seau and the widow of lead plaintiff Ray Easterling, both of whom committed suicide last year. Many other players have no symptoms but seek medical monitoring.
The NFL, in motions to dismiss the case, has argued that it has always followed the best available science and made player safety a top priority.
``Medical decisions override everything else,'' NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said in a speech last month at the University of North Carolina. He is not expected to attend the hearing.
Clement, a former U.S. solicitor general under President George W. Bush who has fought gay marriage, gun-control measures and President Barack Obama's state health care mandates before the Supreme Court.
Players' lawyer David Frederick, an Obama ally, has taken consumer protection fights over investor fees and prescription drug warnings to the high court.

Recent NFL Discussions

Advertisement

NFL Top Stories

Thumbnail Texans vs. Colts Pick The Colts racked up plenty of points in their previous game but is the under the best play when they host the Texans this Sunday?
Thumbnail Bengals vs. Browns Pick Can the Cleveland Browns find a way to compete with the Cincinnati Bengals when the two meet up this Sunday?
Thumbnail Steelers vs. Bills Prediction Will this Sunday's AFC matchup between the Steelers and Bills turn into a high-scoring affair at 1:00PM ET?
Thumbnail Chargers vs. Panthers Pick Will the Carolina Panthers and San Diego Chargers have a shootout when the two meet up on Sunday at 1PM ET?
Thumbnail Raiders vs. Chiefs Pick Is the under a good bet to cash on Thursday night when the Chiefs host the Raiders at 8:25PM ET?

NFL Team Pages