NEW YORK (AP) -Oklahoma could have been playing Virginia Tech in the Orange Bowl if an agreement between the teams, their conferences and the Orange and Fiesta bowls had been approved by BCS officials, according to an report.
The Sooners, the champs of the Big 12, are set to play Big East champion West Virginia in the Fiesta Bowl on Jan. 3, their second consecutive trip to the Glendale, Ariz., Bowl Championship Series game.
The Orange Bowl will match Virginia Tech, the Atlantic Coast Conference champions, and Kansas out of the Big 12 on Jan. 2 in Miami.
There's a clause in the BCS bylaws - which has never been invoked - that allows the commissioners to ``adjust the pairings ... after the completion of the selection process.''
Among the factors that can be considered are ``whether the same team will be playing in the same bowl game for two consecutive years'' (Oklahoma played Boise State in last year's Fiesta Bowl) and ``whether alternative pairings may have greater or lesser appeal to college football fans.'' reported late Monday night that Oklahoma athletic director Joseph Castiglione contacted Fiesta Bowl officials after the Sooners won the Big 12 title on Dec. 1 about the possibility of using that clause to get OU matched up against the highest-ranked team available.
``If we weren't going to be in the 1 vs. 2 game, we wanted to know if there was a possibility to play the highest-ranked team out there,'' Castiglione told ``At that point, we didn't know which team that would be.''
The Sooners finished third in the BCS standings behind Ohio State and LSU. The Buckeyes and Tigers will play in New Orleans on Jan. 7 in the BCS national championship. Virginia Tech was fourth.
The ACC champ is contractually committed to play in the Orange Bowl if it does not qualify for the championship game. The Big 12 champion is tied to the Fiesta Bowl.
According to, after the pairings were set on Dec. 2, but before they were made public, the Orange and Fiesta bowls agreed to swap Kansas and Oklahoma, with the approval of all the teams and leagues involved in those two games.
The alterations failed to gain approval from all the conference commissioners who oversee the BCS and the original pairings remained.
``There was a lengthy discussion, I made my case for it, and others made a case against it. It didn't prevail,'' Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe told ``I don't necessarily agree, but I respect the views of those who were against it.''
Southeastern Conference commissioner and BCS coordinator Mike Slive told, ``There weren't such compelling circumstances as to merit a change.''

Recent NCAAF Discussions

NCAAF Headlines

More inNCAAF News  

NCAAF Top Stories

Thumbnail Sun Devils aim to protect house vs. Cougs Arizona State has won six in a row at Sun Devil Stadium over Washington State. But will that streak come to an end this evening?
Thumbnail Freeze's Rebels eye upset win at Tiger Stadium LSU interim coach Ed Orgeron and Ole Miss’ Hugh Freeze enjoy a warm, longstanding relationship. That’ll surely go by the...
Thumbnail Ohio St. vs. Penn St. Prediction Will No. 2 Ohio State be able to put up enough offense to hit the over when it takes on Penn State tonight...
Thumbnail Oklahoma vs. Texas Tech Prediction Will Texas Tech hang with Oklahoma when the two schools play in a shootout tonight at 8:00PM ET?
Thumbnail Michigan St. vs. Maryland Prediction Can Maryland find a way to upset a struggling Michigan State football team at home when they meet up...
More inNCAAF Articles  

NCAAF Team Pages