Winnowing NCAA tourney field is tough business Print
Written by Admin   
Friday, 13 March 2009 18:01
NCAAB Headline News


 INDIANAPOLIS (AP) -Mike Slive hears the outside world constantly debate NCAA tournament selections.
People argue whether the Big East deserves two, or perhaps, three No. 1 seeds. They want to know how much this weekend's conference tourneys may affect the bracket. Some contend greater emphasis should be placed on the final 12 games while others suggest signature wins should simply be the standard.
Slive, the ultimate insider, ignores the noise. As this year's committee chairman, his job is separating those minute slivers and producing a 65-team bracket that reflects the best of the best.
In some ways, the job has never been tougher.
``Just looking at the coaches and media polls throughout the season, we have seen a revolving door, not only at the top, but throughout the Top 25,'' Slive said Wednesday during a conference call with reporters. ``It's shaping up to be a memorable championship from start to finish. It is also shaping up to be a stressful week for the committee.''
Indeed.
her a bracket that is geographically and competitively balanced.
Fortunately for the committee, Slive knows his way around these discussions.
Four previous selection weekends have taught him how to decipher the nuances about standards, formulas, rules and principles the committee relies upon - even the unexpected. Slive, the SEC commissioner, was in the meeting room last year when word came that a tornado ripped through Atlanta, forcing the conference tournament to find a new site and revise the schedule.
He was there, too, when Georgia surprised everyone by winning the tourney and knocking out an unidentified team from the board just hours before the bracket was released.
Clearly, Slive would like the process to be more simplistic. He has repeatedly said the committee will base its choices on four factors: Who teams played, where they played, who was injured and how they played.
The problem is that it can't be so simple.
The 10 voting members must assess things like whether Oklahoma, which lost two games without the injured Blake Griffin, deserves a No. 1 seed. Or how to seed Marquette, which has struggled since starting guard Dominic James went down with a season-ending foot injury.
ate the team at that time,'' Slive said. ``But it's the whole body of work and the quality of the team as it moves toward tournament time.''
But the complexity of the discussions change when teams such as Ohio State, Notre Dame, Georgetown or Davidson - all of whom were ranked during this season but struggled late - are considered.
Suddenly, road wins and strength of schedule and victories over Top 50 teams become significant factors.
The committee also has to make contingency plans when a team such as Cleveland State, the Horizon League champ, sneaks in. Or, heaven forbid, they have to revise the pairings because a team like Georgia makes it in Sunday afternoon.
To Slive, it's just part of the business.
``I think one of the things the committee has to do is we have to take what happened during the season as the basis for our decision-making,'' he said. ``It would be very hard for us to think about the what-ifs, or if one team could have done this and didn't do this because of that.''
This season hasn't been business as usual - on or off the court.
The rotation near the top of the poll and at the bottom has created a litany of possibilities.
And because many schools are contending with attendance drops or budget cuts, the cost of going to some faraway site can be prohibitive.
keep as many teams as possible close to home. He just can't make any promises because the primary goal of the committee is to make each of the four regions competitively unbalanced.
``We fully recognize that this is a national championship,'' Slive said. ``The committee remains committed to this principle (keeping teams close to home) to the extent it does not adversely impact fair competition.''
But goal No. 1, of course, is getting it right - no matter the opinions, the public perceptions or the controversies that are likely to erupt Sunday night.
``Obviously what transpires in this room over the next five days will be the topic of conversations among basketball fans around the world,'' Slive said. ``We are committed to assembling the best possible brackets for this year's championships.''
 

NCAABB Team Pages

Top NCAABB Public Bets

View All: NFL |  NBA |  NCAAF |  NCAAB |  MLB |  NHL

NCAABB Futures

NCAA BASKETBALL TEAM MENS TOURNAMENT ODDS CURRENT
KENTUCKY 4/1
ARIZONA 8/1
DUKE 10/1
WISCONSIN 12/1
KANSAS 14/1
FLORIDA 14/1
NORTH CAROLINA 16/1
VILLANOVA 25/1
LOUISVILLE 28/1
WICHITA STATE 28/1
View All

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Contact Us | Advertising | 888-99-SPREAD

THIS IS NOT A GAMBLING SITE – If you think you have a gambling problem click here.

Disclaimer: This site is for informational and entertainment purposes only. Individual users are responsible for the laws regarding accessing gambling information from their jurisdictions. Many countries around the world prohibit gambling, please check the laws in your location. Any use of this information that may violate any federal, state, local or international law is strictly prohibited.

Copyright: The information contained on TheSpread.com website is protected by international copyright and may not be reproduced, or redistributed in any way without expressed written consent.

About: TheSpread.com is the largest sports betting news site in the United States. We provide point spread news, odds, statistics and information to over 199 countries around the world each year. Our coverage includes all North American College and Professional Sports as well as entertainment, political and proposition wagering news.

©1999-2013 TheSpread.com